Search for: "Rodriguez v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Herrera, City Attorney, (San Francisco) and Danny Chou, Chief of Complex and Special Ligation, for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
The Supreme Court took a case raising a similar question in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
County of San Bernardino (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 352 holding that the imposition of an administrative leave may constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
County of San Bernardino, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed whether paid administrative leave could constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
The San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl Poinsettia BowlQualcomm Stadium, San Diego, California - Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:00 p.m. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 29, 2007 Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972) ("there is no privilege. . . in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient"); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
